| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152 |
- TODO
- ====
- Highlighted results gallery creation:
- - One gallery or just larger thumbnails and at the top ?
- - system to vote for highlighted results ?
- - commenting system
- - visulisation of metadata
- - mock up the rest (upload your file, see private sfb gallery, link to other results)
- Look at receipe website for inspiration.
- talk with Larkum
- ==========================
- Feedback presentation on the 13th
- -----
- 1. Result gallery too intricate with RDM
- Due to the splitting of the talk, People got confused about the goal of the results gallery tool, which is not primarly data management.
- It would be better to present the project withotut even mentioning RDM as a side effect (at least not before we can show it).
- Main Goal should be: tell people of your work (and convince them it is important).
- 2. Preachy
- - The talk was felt as an advertisment for RDM, which might not be the best feeling. RDM is attached to administrative work, i.e. somehting going against research.
- - Most people see the ethical aspects of sharing data and managing it. We fight against lazyness, and priority setting, not good intentions.
- - People feel open data is overrated, because most of the data will not be re-used anytime.
- 3. Don#t mention technical aspects
- no ones care!
- Result gallery, next steps
- -----------------------
- > Everything ones see must be impressive at first look.
- This has consequences: first RG page should get a selection of highlighted results. Its form still needs to be worked out, maybe a graphical abstract, or a frontpage-type of image.
- This selection should get full metadata:
- - to expose people with best practices
- - to show off to the world
|
