#45 Use git configuration if possible

开启中
sprenger3 年之前创建 · 5 条评论
sprenger 评论于 3 年之前

Currently the configuration of gin-cli permits to define also git (annex) specific parameters, e.g. the condition for adding files to git annex instead of git, see gin-cli configuration. These git (annex) specifications can also performed via git directly, i.e. within .gitattributes (e.g via annex.largefiles). Having two locations for these configurations might lead to inconsistent behaviour when using different tools to work with a gin repository as they might give priority to different configuration files. Maybe it would be best to use the git configuration options also from the gin-cli side to avoid duplication here?

Currently the configuration of gin-cli permits to define also git (annex) specific parameters, e.g. the condition for adding files to git annex instead of git, see [gin-cli configuration](https://gin.g-node.org/G-Node/Info/wiki/GIN+CLI+Config). These git (annex) specifications can also performed via git directly, i.e. within [`.gitattributes`](https://git-annex.branchable.com/git-annex-config/) (e.g via annex.largefiles). Having two locations for these configurations might lead to inconsistent behaviour when using different tools to work with a gin repository as they might give priority to different configuration files. Maybe it would be best to use the git configuration options also from the gin-cli side to avoid duplication here?
Achilleas Koutsou 评论于 3 年之前
所有者

I was (almost) certain I had a gin-cli GitHub issue about this but it seems I was mistaken.

I agree, gin-cli should read and obey git configurations instead of defining its own.

I was (almost) certain I had a gin-cli GitHub issue about this but it seems I was mistaken. I agree, gin-cli should read and obey git configurations instead of defining its own.
Achilleas Koutsou 评论于 3 年之前
所有者
GitHub issue: https://github.com/G-Node/gin-cli/issues/302
sprenger 评论于 3 年之前
发布者

Ok, then should we close this one again or do you want to keep it open as reference for others users?

Ok, then should we close this one again or do you want to keep it open as reference for others users?
Achilleas Koutsou 评论于 3 年之前
所有者

Keep it as a reference.

Keep it as a reference.
sprenger 评论于 3 年之前
发布者

Another comment regarding the unification of configuration parameters: I noticed that the exclude configuration of gin-cli behaves differently than the .gitattributes configuration via git annex directly. The gin-cli seems to apply the provided patterns to the complete paths of files, whereas git annex seems to check per file & folder name of the given path. E.g. when excluding config*, the gin-cli does not exclude the file data/config.txt, but plain git annex would.

Another comment regarding the unification of configuration parameters: I noticed that the `exclude` configuration of gin-cli behaves differently than the `.gitattributes` configuration via git annex directly. The gin-cli seems to apply the provided patterns to the complete paths of files, whereas git annex seems to check per file & folder name of the given path. E.g. when excluding `config*`, the gin-cli does not exclude the file `data/config.txt`, but plain git annex would.
登录 并参与到对话中。
未选择里程碑
未指派成员
2 名参与者
正在加载...
取消
保存
这个人很懒,什么都没留下。