fa_CC_MOp-MOp_dilated_cut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CC_MOp-MOp_dilated_cut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. =================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0006
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -----------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -----------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 49169.360 0.000 1.000 -96370.174 96370.174
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.062 0.039 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. =================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ==================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. --------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0032 0.9 -0.0132 0.0196 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0009 0.9 -0.0182 0.0164 False
  24. 0 14 0.0011 0.9 -0.0159 0.0182 False
  25. 0 21 0.0033 0.9 -0.0138 0.0203 False
  26. 0 28 0.0033 0.9 -0.0144 0.0209 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0041 0.9 -0.02 0.0118 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0021 0.9 -0.0177 0.0136 False
  29. 3 21 0.0001 0.9 -0.0156 0.0157 False
  30. 3 28 0.0 0.9 -0.0163 0.0164 False
  31. 7 14 0.002 0.9 -0.0146 0.0186 False
  32. 7 21 0.0041 0.9 -0.0125 0.0208 False
  33. 7 28 0.0041 0.9 -0.0131 0.0214 False
  34. 14 21 0.0021 0.9 -0.0142 0.0185 False
  35. 14 28 0.0021 0.9 -0.0149 0.0192 False
  36. 21 28 -0.0 0.9 -0.017 0.017 False
  37. --------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0141 0.4482 -0.008 0.0362 False
  44. 0 7 0.0067 0.9 -0.0137 0.0271 False
  45. 0 14 0.0122 0.4727 -0.0074 0.0318 False
  46. 0 21 0.0238 0.0303 0.0014 0.0462 True
  47. 0 28 0.0149 0.3367 -0.0064 0.0361 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0074 0.9 -0.0298 0.015 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0019 0.9 -0.0235 0.0198 False
  50. 3 21 0.0098 0.8367 -0.0145 0.034 False
  51. 3 28 0.0008 0.9 -0.0224 0.024 False
  52. 7 14 0.0055 0.9 -0.0144 0.0255 False
  53. 7 21 0.0172 0.2541 -0.0056 0.0399 False
  54. 7 28 0.0082 0.8737 -0.0134 0.0298 False
  55. 14 21 0.0116 0.6289 -0.0104 0.0336 False
  56. 14 28 0.0027 0.9 -0.0182 0.0235 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0089 0.8734 -0.0325 0.0146 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.06469605] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.03886165] Yes
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.00127062] Yes
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.02110625] Yes
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.10063108] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.54994228] No